Alphabet: News Media Man

Alphabet: News

Websites

SEJ · SEO

Google’s Recommender System Breakthrough Detects Semantic Intent

Google quietly published a research paper on personalized semantics for recommender systems like Google Discover and YouTube.

January 6, 2026

(In Case You Missed It)

By Roger Montti

Google published a research paper about helping recommender systems understand what users mean when they interact with them. Their goal with this new approach is to overcome the limitations inherent in the current state-of-the-art recommender systems in order to get a finer, detailed understanding of what users want to read, listen to, or watch at the level of the individual.

Personalized Semantics

Recommender systems predict what a user would like to read or watch next. YouTube, Google Discover, and Google News are examples of recommender systems for recommending content to users. Other kinds of recommender systems are shopping recommendations.

Recommender systems generally work by collecting data about the kinds of things a user clicks on, rates, buys, and watches and then using that data to suggest more content that aligns with a user’s preferences.

The researchers referred to those kinds of signals as primitive user feedback because they’re not so good at recommendations based on an individual’s subjective judgment about what’s funny, cute, or boring.

The intuition behind the research is that the rise of LLMs presents an opportunity to leverage natural language interactions to better understand what a user wants through identifying semantic intent.

The researchers explain:

“Interactive recommender systems have emerged as a promising paradigm to overcome the limitations of the primitive user feedback used by traditional recommender systems (e.g., clicks, item consumption, ratings). They allow users to express intent, preferences, constraints, and contexts in a richer fashion, often using natural language (including faceted search and dialogue). (Search Engine Journal)

Full article via Search Engine Journal
@sejournal

https://searchenginejournal.com/googles-recommender-system-breakthrough-detects-semantic-intent/564393/

Social Media

Media Man Peg On

SEJ's Roger on Google and YouTube recommendation synaptics aka systems. Our pop culture reference on today's Search Engine Journal web tips is that if it's a "recommendation" from the powers that be at Google/YouTube/Alphabet you might want to think closely about doing it, akin to the original families in New York. They are calling it a "recommendation". Just having a bit of fun with this one boss. Back to the webcode and algorithms boss. Special project perhaps for the new recruits from Tony's establishment. Not much escapes "The Big G". Media chapter logging out until the late shift at The Plex.

Profiles

Social Media Business Search Engines

Multimedia

Alphabet 2023 Q4 Earnings Call

Search Engine News

May 20, 2024

Alphabet's Google has preemptively paid damages to the U.S. government, an unusual move aimed at avoiding a jury trial in the Justice Department's antitrust lawsuit over its digital advertising business.

Google disclosed, opens new tab the payment, but not the amount, in a court filing last week that said the case should be heard and decided by a judge directly. Without a monetary damages claim, Google argued, the government has no right to a jury trial.

The Justice Department, which has not said if it will accept the payment, declined to comment on the filing.

Google asserted that its check, which it said covered its alleged overcharges for online ads, allows it to sidestep a jury trial whether or not the government takes it.

The Justice Department filed the case last year with Virginia and other states, alleging Google was stifling competition for advertising technology. The government has said Google should be forced to sell its ad manager suite.

Google, which has denied the allegations, said in a statement that the Justice Department “manufactured a damages claim at the last minute in an attempt to secure a jury trial.” Without disclosing the size of its payment, Google said that after months of discovery, the Justice Department could only point to estimated damages of less than $1 million.

The company said the government has said the case is “highly technical” and “outside the everyday knowledge of most prospective jurors.”

The Justice Department will have a chance to respond to Google's arguments before a judge considers the question at a hearing scheduled for June 21 in Alexandria, Virginia, federal court. The trial is set for September, currently before a jury.

Stanford Law School's Mark Lemley told media he was skeptical Google’s gambit would prevail. He said a jury could ultimately decide higher damages than whatever Google put forward.

“Antitrust cases regularly go to juries. I think it is a sign that Google is worried about what a jury will do,” Lemley said.

Another legal scholar, Herbert Hovenkamp of the University of Pennsylvania’s law school, called Google's move "smart" in a post on X. “Juries are bad at deciding technical cases, and further they do not have the authority to order a breakup,” he wrote.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 2016 case that an offer for “complete relief” did not wipe out a class-action claim. But Google argued its payment is different, because it submitted an actual check and not merely an offer.

Google has faced two antitrust trials in recent months, but only one involved a jury.

In that case, a jury in San Francisco ruled for “Fortnite” maker Epic Games that Google illegally barred competing Android app stores and forced developers to use its payment system for in-app transactions.

In the other case, a Washington, D.C. federal judge is weighing allegations that Google has unlawfully stifled competition for web search. The court heard closing arguments this month but has not ruled.

The case is United States v. Google LLC, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, No. 1:23-cv-00108.

For U.S.: Julia Tarver Wood and Aaron Teitelbaum of the Department of Justice

For Google: Eric Mahr and Andrew Ewalt of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; Kannon Shanmugam and Karen Dunn of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; and Daniel Bitton and Bradley Justus of Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider.

(Wires)

G is for Google

As part of that, we also said that you could expect us to make “smaller bets in areas that might seem very speculative or even strange when compared to our current businesses.” From the start, we’ve always strived to do more, and to do important and meaningful things with the resources we have.

We did a lot of things that seemed crazy at the time. Many of those crazy things now have over a billion users, like Google Maps, YouTube, Chrome, and Android. And we haven’t stopped there. We are still trying to do things other people think are crazy but we are super excited about.

We’ve long believed that over time companies tend to get comfortable doing the same thing, just making incremental changes. But in the technology industry, where revolutionary ideas drive the next big growth areas, you need to be a bit uncomfortable to stay relevant.

Our company is operating well today, but we think we can make it cleaner and more accountable. So we are creating a new company, called Alphabet. I am really excited to be running Alphabet as CEO with help from my capable partner, Sergey, as President.

What is Alphabet? Alphabet is mostly a collection of companies. The largest of which, of course, is Google. This newer Google is a bit slimmed down, with the companies that are pretty far afield of our main internet products contained in Alphabet instead. What do we mean by far afield? Good examples are our health efforts: Life Sciences (that works on the glucose-sensing contact lens), and Calico (focused on longevity). Fundamentally, we believe this allows us more management scale, as we can run things independently that aren’t very related.

Alphabet is about businesses prospering through strong leaders and independence. In general, our model is to have a strong CEO who runs each business, with Sergey and me in service to them as needed. We will rigorously handle capital allocation and work to make sure each business is executing well. We’ll also make sure we have a great CEO for each business, and we’ll determine their compensation. In addition, with this new structure we plan to implement segment reporting for our Q4 results, where Google financials will be provided separately than those for the rest of Alphabet businesses as a whole.

This new structure will allow us to keep tremendous focus on the extraordinary opportunities we have inside of Google. A key part of this is Sundar Pichai. Sundar has been saying the things I would have said (and sometimes better!) for quite some time now, and I’ve been tremendously enjoying our work together. He has really stepped up since October of last year, when he took on product and engineering responsibility for our internet businesses. Sergey and I have been super excited about his progress and dedication to the company. And it is clear to us and our board that it is time for Sundar to be CEO of Google. I feel very fortunate to have someone as talented as he is to run the slightly slimmed down Google and this frees up time for me to continue to scale our aspirations. I have been spending quite a bit of time with Sundar, helping him and the company in any way I can, and I will of course continue to do that. Google itself is also making all sorts of new products, and I know Sundar will always be focused on innovation—continuing to stretch boundaries. I know he deeply cares that we can continue to make big strides on our core mission to organize the world’s information. Recent launches like Google Photos and Google Now using machine learning are amazing progress. Google also has some services that are run with their own identity, like YouTube. Susan is doing a great job as CEO, running a strong brand and driving incredible growth.

Sergey and I are seriously in the business of starting new things. Alphabet will also include our X lab, which incubates new efforts like Wing, our drone delivery effort. We are also stoked about growing our investment arms, Ventures and Capital, as part of this new structure.

Alphabet Inc. will replace Google Inc. as the publicly-traded entity and all shares of Google will automatically convert into the same number of shares of Alphabet, with all of the same rights. Google will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alphabet. Our two classes of shares will continue to trade on Nasdaq as GOOGL and GOOG.

For Sergey and me this is a very exciting new chapter in the life of Google—the birth of Alphabet. We liked the name Alphabet because it means a collection of letters that represent language, one of humanity’s most important innovations, and is the core of how we index with Google search! We also like that it means alpha-bet (Alpha is investment return above benchmark), which we strive for! I should add that we are not intending for this to be a big consumer brand with related products—the whole point is that Alphabet companies should have independence and develop their own brands.

We are excited about…

Getting more ambitious things done.
Taking the long-term view.
Empowering great entrepreneurs and companies to flourish.
Investing at the scale of the opportunities and resources we see.
Improving the transparency and oversight of what we’re doing.
Making Google even better through greater focus.

Larry Page

Alphabet Inc. is an American multinational technology conglomerate holding company headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015,] and became the parent company of Google and several former Google subsidiaries. Alphabet is the world's third-largest technology company by revenue and one of the world's most valuable companies.] It is one of the Big Five American information technology companies, alongside Amazon, Apple, Meta and Microsoft.

The establishment of Alphabet Inc. was prompted by a desire to make the core Google business "cleaner and more accountable" while allowing greater autonomy to group companies that operate in businesses other than Internet services. Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin announced their resignation from their executive posts in December 2019, with the CEO role to be filled by Sundar Pichai, also the CEO of Google. Page and Brin remain employees, board members, and controlling shareholders of Alphabet Inc.

(Wikipedia)

Media Man

FAANG Directory

Facebook Amazon Apple Netflix Google

Profiles

Social Media Business Search Engines

Websites

In finance, “FAANG” is an acronym that refers to the stocks of five prominent American technology companies: Meta (META) (formerly known as Facebook), Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), Netflix (NFLX); and Alphabet (GOOG) (formerly known as Google).

The term was popularized by Jim Cramer, the television host of CNBC's Mad Money, in 2013, who praised these companies for being “totally dominant in their markets." Originally, the term "FANG" was used, with Apple—the second “A” in the acronym—added in 2017.

FAANG is an acronym referring to the stocks of the five most popular and best-performing American technology companies.

These are: Meta (formerly known as Facebook); Amazon; Apple; Netflix; and Alphabet (formerly known as Google).

In addition to being widely known among consumers, the five FAANG stocks are among the largest companies in the world.

Some have raised concerns that the FAANG stocks may be in the midst of a bubble, whereas others argue that their growth is justified by the stellar financial and operational performance they have shown in recent years.

The term was coined by The Street's Bob Lang and popularized by Jim Cramer on his CNBC TV show Mad Money.

News

Meta Institutes Hiring Freeze, Budget Cuts, Corporate Restructuring - September 29, 2022

Facebook parent, Meta, plans to do a hiring freeze, reorganize teams and reducing headcount for the first time in company history.

By Brian Frederick

Social media company Meta is instituting a hiring freeze and warning employees about further restructuring and downsizing. The announcement came from CEO Mark Zuckerberg on an internal all-hands call, Bloomberg reported.

The company, which owns Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp, will reportedly be slashing budgets across most teams.

This announcement comes just one week after the Wall Street Journal reported certain Meta employees have been told to find new roles in the company or face downsizing. According to that report, workers on a “30-day list” had to quickly find a new role in the company or risk termination.

This is the company’s first major budget cut since the founding of Facebook in 2004 and seemingly heralds an end to the era of rapid social media growth.

Zuckerberg Points to Economic Uncertainty as Driving Factor

Meta leadership blamed current economic conditions for the cuts.

“I had hoped the economy would have more clearly stabilized by now, but from what we’re seeing it doesn’t yet seem like it has, so we want to plan somewhat conservatively,” Zuckerberg told employees in a Q&A session, according to Bloomberg.

Earlier this year, Meta reported its first-ever decline in ad revenue. This was largely driven by Apple changing the privacy policy for its iOS to allow iPhone users to opt out of having their data tracked across apps.

Additionally, the company’s growth has been hindered by competition with TikTok, which is drawing users away from Instagram and Facebook.

Meta Has Been Preparing for Cuts for Months

Meta began slowing hiring in July as the company seemed to begin bracing itself for cuts. After missing its quarterly earnings target for the first quarter of 2022, Zuckerberg indicated Meta would be slowing the pace of its investments.

He also warned that some Meta teams would shrink in response to the decline in revenue and suggested the company was approaching a downturn.

This was also the first year in Facebook’s 18-year history in which the company did not grow.

Many Advertising-Driven Companies Struggling with Economic Challenges

On top of internal challenges, Meta, like many tech companies, has seen its value drop since the Federal Reserve raised interest rates on September 22.

Twitter announced a hiring freeze of its own last May and reportedly asked employees to reduce spending wherever possible. Last month, Snapchat reduced its workforce by 20%.

Even Google has not been immune. Alphabet, Inc, the search engine giant’s parent company, slowed its hiring rate in the back half of 2022.

*click here for full article

(Search Engine Journal)

Social Media

Greg Tingle

Search Engine Journal with a concise news report on Meta / Facebook, or whatever they wish to call themselves. Indicators point to the rebrand not working well as all, and Zuck being the face of the Metaverse may be another mistep. Facebook er Meta is not the news media, industry, tech or investor darling they were in say the 2007 to 2017 period. The political involvement, wokeness and myriad of serious scandals has hurt them badly, perhaps beyond reasonable repair. Numerous advertisers have jumped ship to elsewhere or are just doing their own organic based themselves without big firms giving them often inaccurate numbers and below par results. The genie is out of the bottle. Can Meta/Facebook ever gets it's mojo back to the point where everyone wants to be their "friend" again? Down but are they out for good? Facebook's loss may just be Google's, YouTube's and LinkedIn's gain! My opinion of course, since FB wanted to push their opinions, community viewpoint etc onto others. FB - the story of ying and yang and energy exchange impacting their business and bottom line. Back to YouTube, LinkedIn and own media now.