NRL players told they need to take 87pc pay cut to save the game


NRL players told they need to take 87pc pay cut to save the game - 26th March 2020

Profiles

Sports Sports Betting Television Wrestling Business Gaming Entertainment Pop Culture Steaming

Advertising Promotions

NRL players will be asked to take an 87 per cent pay cut if the season doesn't return in 2020. CREDIT: AAP


By Michael Chammas

NRL players have until Wednesday to decide if they will accept the governing body's proposal of an 87 per cent pay cut to ensure the survival of the sport if the governing body is forced to cancel the entire 2020 season as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

The Herald has been told that the NRL, working on a worst-case basis without further games this season, has just over $12 million left for player payments to be made before the end of the rugby league financial year on October 31.

The players have already been paid their share of $67m over the past five months, but the NRL doesn't have the funds to pay out the remaining $93m the players were expecting over the next seven months.

The $12m the NRL has works out at roughly $26,000 per player for the next seven months, if the salary cap is shared equally across the 480 players in each of the 16 clubs' top 30 squads.

The Rugby League Players Association was expected to hold an emergency phone hook-up on Thursday night to discuss the substantial pay cuts and whether they would be willing to agree to an 80 to 90 per cent reduction on their salaries for the remainder of the league financial year. No agreement is in place as yet.

One of the models being discussed is a tiered pay-cut system that will see the highest paid players in the game share in a greater percentage of the financial reduction.

There are also discussions being had about the way the pay-cut is structured, with plans for players to receive 50 per cent of their pay for the next two months and then none for the following five months if the NRL doesn't return this year.

The reason for the Wednesday, April 1 deadline is to ensure a system is in place before the players' next pay cycle. The RLPA is still waiting for more clarity from the NRL in regards to its financial position.

*click here for full article and multimedia

(The Sydney Morning Herald)

Facebook

SMH Sport

Greg Tingle

That 87% pay cut sounds about in line with the reduction in job or business income for many Australians over the past couple of weeks, or even 6 to 12 months if you look at sectors such as tourism, media or eco. An expression that comes to mind right now is "welcome to the club", or, "we're all in it together". I look forward to the day where all Australians can look forward to a 500% to 1000% income rise, but it's extremely unlikely that will be this year or even next. At least some people are still able to derive an income for the things they are both good at and enjoy. Do what you love and you will never work a day in your life. Food, water, shelter, sport...not all that bad. There's always someone in a worse off situation. For the love of football. Game on Pause.

Martin Heppell

they will still earn 3 times what the normal person earns a yr

Greg Tingle

I tend to agree. In my 20 years plus of being in business, and in my forties, I have noticed that many people aren't that keen on disclosing what they really earn, be it per year or whatever. This coronavirus financial crash has really let the genie out of the bottle. And so the NRL brought in over 2 billion bucks over less than a decade period, and they have just enough money left in the kitty for the game to survive for about 3 months. Mismanagement from any angle. Not enough moolah for rainy day. It's raining cats, dogs and exotic animals. But no one got caught with their hand in the cookie jar, but you got to wonder. Players and management have been overpaid, but to my thinking that's still a stack of cash not accounted for. Who grabbed the money and got away with it? Send it Poirot or Colombo for this one. Australian crime of the decade!